<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Californians&#8217; opinion shifts in favor of nuclear power</title>
	<link>http://www.chuckdevore.com/blog/2008/07/17/californians-opinion-shifts-in-favor-of-nuclear-power/</link>
	<description>Official Blog of California Assemblyman Chuck DeVore</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: fredc</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckdevore.com/blog/2008/07/17/californians-opinion-shifts-in-favor-of-nuclear-power/#comment-1313</link>
		<dc:creator>fredc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 11:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chuckdevore.com/blog/2008/07/17/californians-opinion-shifts-in-favor-of-nuclear-power/#comment-1313</guid>
		<description>Hydrogen is not an efficient use of any power source..another added unnecessary step when they can just send that nighttime generated power to our electric cars. Hydrogen is a b---- to harness physically, and it requires special hose, and leads to "hydrogen embrittlement" of metals. If there is a breakthrough w/ onboard water separation systems, or other in-car means of h2 generation, that's fine..but mass production of h2 isn't going to fly. Iceland can swing it with their free geothermal, but even then isn't cheap as geothermal is a very challenging source to utilize..harder than it appears.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hydrogen is not an efficient use of any power source..another added unnecessary step when they can just send that nighttime generated power to our electric cars. Hydrogen is a b&#8212;- to harness physically, and it requires special hose, and leads to &#8220;hydrogen embrittlement&#8221; of metals. If there is a breakthrough w/ onboard water separation systems, or other in-car means of h2 generation, that&#8217;s fine..but mass production of h2 isn&#8217;t going to fly. Iceland can swing it with their free geothermal, but even then isn&#8217;t cheap as geothermal is a very challenging source to utilize..harder than it appears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry DeVore</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckdevore.com/blog/2008/07/17/californians-opinion-shifts-in-favor-of-nuclear-power/#comment-1106</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry DeVore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 00:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chuckdevore.com/blog/2008/07/17/californians-opinion-shifts-in-favor-of-nuclear-power/#comment-1106</guid>
		<description>Do not leave out the possibility of the nighttime power generating hydrogen
also.  this is a future fuel source.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do not leave out the possibility of the nighttime power generating hydrogen<br />
also.  this is a future fuel source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
